ISFCA prioritises cases by risk level, scale of harm, and recurrence of schemes, initiates reviews without delay, and coordinates actions through to asset recovery. The public documentation of cases strengthens the preventive effect and helps identify and disrupt emerging threats more quickly.
In assessing each signal, ISFCA considers both the actual consequences of the misconduct and its potential to undermine confidence in the financial system.
ISFCA assesses whether an incident is isolated or indicative of a broader pattern of misconduct.
An important factor is how quickly the organisation identified the risk and which control mechanisms did or did not operate effectively.
ISFCA does not replace law enforcement authorities, but facilitates the initiation of reviews, the collection and structuring of evidence, and the establishment of a foundation for subsequent decisions and asset recovery.
Where a risk affects a broad range of users or organisations, ISFCA issues public alerts and coordinates the exchange of threat indicators in order to reduce the window for repeated exploitation of the scheme.